RICK SANTORUM IS A LEFT-WING PUPPET AND THE LEFT WING ADMITS IT. This is not a joke.

DECIDING BETWEEN SANTORUM AND NEWT IS EASY BECAUSE THE LIBERALS CHOSE SANTORUM!  It is called "Operation Hilarity" and it has been organized by ultra-left- wing radio personalities, the daily KOS and other radical, far-left troublemakers, and they have gotten boots on the ground all over America to vote for Santorum because all the smart analysis has recognized that Santorum is the weakest top beat Obama in a general election. 

Therefore, the liberals who want Obama to win have chosen Santorum to go against Obama. They have helped to make up our minds for us, in reverse. If the liberals chose Santorum, and they did, then that is our signal to choose Newt. All we have to do is get that message out everywhere before it is too late and we will win. You betcha! Newt for President!

CNN
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NapDB_lwv9U

Washinton post
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/post/is-operation-hilarity-working/2012/02/28/gIQAbnh3gR_blog.html

GEORGIA'S BIG WIN FOR NEWT AND COORDINATING ON THIS BLOG FOR NEWT

*** THIS POST HAS BEEN EDITED. READ BELOW ***

Congratulations to our man Newt for scoring his home state of Georgia by a bigger-than-expected margin. That was a real blow-out. You would never know, however, because Rick Santorum is the media darling and for good reason:


http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/next-santorum-gingrich-barnstorm-south-164119178.html

It turns out that liberals are switching party affiliations and voting in our GOP primaries to put the worst possible candidate - Santorum - up against Obama. Google "Operation Hilarity" to learn about the truth of it; Dick morris, CNN and others have reported this movement so it's real, not a joke, and they are ruining our primary process by trying to control it and they have boots on the ground in the tens of thousands - it matters  (even their name for the operation simply drips of liberal smugness: "Operation Hilarity". Makes your blood boil, doesn't it?).

 http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/02/15/1065052/-Announcing-Operation-Hilarity-Let-s-keep-the-GOP-clown-show-going-

 http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/post/is-operation-hilarity-working/2012/02/28/gIQAbnh3gR_blog.html

 http://www.dickmorris.com/blog/dont-let-obama-dictate-our-candidate/

WE CAN DO SOMETHING - and make your one voice reach tens of thousands in seconds.

 We need to get more active than simple arguing with trolls on Facebook. We need to be Newt's advertising machine. Take it from a media specialist in NYC who knows advertising; we can do it.

***EDIT ***
The lack of response signals to me that

1. I should not leave hints up for other side to guess the strategy, and

2. My effectiveness as an online champion for Newt is probably coming to a close. I expected a few friends from FB to join together here, at least initially, but that is not proving to be the case. 

Know this: "WORKING" for Newt is not spinning your wheels arguing with trolls on Facebook, allowing yourself to get off-topic on those boards; the people with whom you are arguing are being paid by ACRON and the like to keep you there arguing and doing nothing productive. The productive people, like myself and others,stay on-topic, to the point and continually post devastating evidence against the opposition sooner or later get thrown off. I know two others for sure. 

That is not to say people should abandon Facebook - simply stop wasting your time debating minutia with trolls - you cannot win on the territory that have terraformed for their own advantage: they're organized - you have noticed, I'm sure, that the moment you start to win an argument 5 other people show up out of nowhere to talk you down. That isn't a coincidence.  While you sit down after dinner and  chat at your leisure feeling terribly, terribly helpful and important - and strategically isolated -  they are a tight, strategically organized and well-oiled  machine. 

The left does what it does because it can not argue the merits, so those people organize and cheat. We sit as uncoordinated individuals and declare the truth. Result? We're getting killed. 

If you don't want the liberals to win, you better get organized and I do not mean manning phone banks and attending fundraiser pancake breakfasts. Our opposition plays fast, dirty and they are as tight as a spring clock. We need to be the same way and be that way fast. If you want to win this, take a little time and trouble to speak up - and sign up - to this board because I don't know of any other that takes this attitude and approach. If you know of another that does, stop wasting time arguing with paid operatives about right and wrong on Facebook and get involved. . This is about getting things done and influencing people on a large scale with strategic tricks that work. And please don't tell me "people are doing more behind the scenes than you know." Two people who told me that in that last three years turned out to be people working for the opposition attempting to lull people us into a false sense of security. The opposition may be crazy, but they are anything but stupid. 

The reality is - and it is a reality - that we are disorganized and essentially naked to attack. We need to start playing like they do. We need to get organized and meet and get things done as a well-oiled machine. If need be, we need to play dirty. If I don't hear from some serious people in the next week I am closing this blog down and will simply pray that one of the people who could have done something and did not had a better solution than sitting for endless hours on Facebook chatting with people who are being paid to give us busy work while their real operations are taking us apart from the inside out. 

I can organize an evening of proven strategic activity that is certain to work. But if you are interested, you need to say so. Otherwise I will simply assume that I being met with the same response some of us got in 2008 - all talk and no learning of new habits that make a difference by passionate conservatives who are dead certain they are achivibg real results by arguing with people being paid to absorb your time and energy and will shut this board down and pray for a miracle, because we are losing right now against the left, and that's a fact. 

Am I coming across like a unnecessarily tough hard-ass? Yes. But I know of no other way to express this. The situation is what it is and we're running out of time quickly.

The choice is yours. Rush and Hannity will not save you - Obama's election and current poll numbers show they have failed. Arguing with trolls will only buy their co-workers the time they need to succeed. You need to play like the opposition. I can help but can do no more without your cooperation and involvement. It's up to you. But you need to act fast.

` Proe

COORDINATING OUR ONLINE EFFORTS FOR NEWT IN THE FINAL STRETCH

.... and this could very well be seen as the final stretch. Today many delegates are up for grabs, and depending on today's results, which look good, a fast and surgical series of online activities could really put the word out about Newt - the correct word; the truth about Newt's accomplishment and solutions, ideas, caring for the nation and just plain brilliance, not the leftist spin over which we, believe it or not, do have some power.

Before going any further, I need to know how many are on board with this idea of working together;  a few of us have tried activist solutions online for other political topics  in ways which are entirely legal and above-board, lest you worry, with great success. But I need to know who is with us and who is not, even if only using your internet name. People known to me from Facebook are particularly welcome, BTW. So if you are on-board, please post "Aye". Don;t expect many "Ayes" immediately - this blog is all of one day old and while people know me, no one knows this, yet.


On a final note, people have made copies of the Newt vs Obama debates and have started cutting it up with their own "superior" take on it, and this includes cutting out all the kudos Newt gets from the best and brightest - one even replaced it with a stupid "ready to rumble" opening. This may seem cute and a 'way to get the word out", but what these amatuers are doing (I've been successful in media in NYC for 25 years) is ruining the message; the debate illustration in the second half is only convincing to third parties who have only heard the liberal spin about Newt if you know that Newt has won all the prvious debates with huge acclaim. Otherwise, it just looks like a desperate and lame attempt to make Newt look like something he isn't - when in fact, he is. If you stumble upon any of these ham-firsted re-edits - done in violation of the terms of use (trolls looking for attention don't care) - shout them down and humiliate them for operating against the Youtube terms of service.  Ruining the message as carefully crafted does not help Newt regardless of the person's intentions - it hurts him. If we want to win we need to be professional - and those people are not being that.


So the video notwithstanding, please give an "Aye" if you are on-board with coordinating your efforts with others quickly  for the best possible effect, and we'll see how many people are on-board and where we can go from there. Telling other Newt supporters about this board might be a good preliminary first step.


Here's the original video: you can help by spreading it around, but there is much more we can do as a unified effort to get the word out about Newt, should any of you be interested., should any of you be interested.


~ Proe 

ORIGINAL PROE GRAPHIQUE ART FOR YOU TO USE ONLINE - THE GALLERY

A PICTURE IS WORTH A THOUSAND WORDS. I didn't write that line, but I do believe it. Here are some originals that you can download and post online on your favorite blogs and message boards; not at all the usual "Online Political Art", the novelties are designed to be unusually eye-catching, and that helps make them effective. Use them; it beats arguing online with trolls! Click on each one to download the larger image.

NEWT DEBATES OBAMA - THE DEBATE PREVIEW

a Video by Proe Graphique

If anything needs to be said, then you've missed the point. ;)

COULD NEWT GINGRICH BE AN EVEN BETTER PRESIDENT THAN RONALD REAGAN? I'M BEGINNING TO THINK SO ~

By Proe Graphique

Reagan came into office as a successful former governor, once divorced and re-married, and had liberal kids who publicly decried him both for his politics and as a father. He was strong on stage but had a spotty record in debates, and once against Mondale had a heart-stopping brain-freeze, though he nevertheless roared to an historic victory, bringing the now-famous "Reagan Democrats" with him. He was a staunch conservative who was vilified by the mainstream media that often tried to use exaggerations about his past to denounce him, and often called him a shallow actor and mocked his age. Yet he was indisputably the greatest President of the last hundred years. Reagan charmed his enemies, outmaneuvered his opponents, made coalitions with his adversaries, and led this country to a joyous, prosperous time.

Enter Newt Gingrich. Never a former actor but always gigantically powerful on-stage, Newt's debating performances have been to a one universally heralded as nothing less than spectacular and he has been universally declared the winner of each debate, while also nevertheless earning the mockery and scorn of the left-wing media, like Reagan. The time Newt might have otherwise spent in the activities the great Reagan pursued, he was doing remarkable, historic achievements, like almost single-handedly leading the GOP to the first congressional majority in 40 years. He was the first speaker in modern history to balance the federal budget four times in a row. Newt's devotion to conservative principles is so strong that no one since Reagan has been so reviled and vilified by the left-wing press as he has.

Newt's devotion to conservatism is equal to Reagan, on whose political knee Newt learned the ropes, and whom Reagan personally liked. Newt is a better debater than Reagan was - and anyone else is, demonstrating a rapid-fire encyclopedic understanding of the facts that is simply stunning. Newt also uses an easy good humor, like Reagan did, to keep things in perspective while instinctively showing his human side. Like Reagan, Newt has charmed his enemies, outmaneuvered his opponents, made coalitions with his adversaries - and won. Like Reagan, Newt Gingrich believes in a strong national defense - promising to destroy any Korean test missile before it even leaves the launch pad - confronting our enemies, helping our allies, believes that the courts should be the weakest of the three powers, is economically and socially conservative, believes in keeping our pristine vistas unspoiled and also loves animals, like Reagan did.

The comparisons between Reagan and Gingrich are stunning with one huge difference - Newt has already as Speaker of the House accomplished things of which Reagan could have never dreamed before becoming President, and no one else currently in office or running for office can touch Newt in terms of accomplishment.

If Newt Gingrich realizes his positively manifest potential as President of the United States given these facts, there is little question that Newt would not only be equal to Reagan, but prove the better - and the best - President of the last hundred years, not only for that potential, but for the times that define great Presidents, for we are certainly in such times.

If we believe that Reagan was the finest President in the last hundred years, we're simply crazy if we don't vote for Newt Gingrich now.

NEWT 2012

*** LET'S GET REAL ABOUT NEWT'S UNFAIRLY MOCKED MOON STATION IDEA - IT'S BRILLIANT AND NASA HAS ALREADY PAVED THE WAY; IT CAN BE DONE - EASILY ***

                                                   A working NASA moon station module

~ Proe Graphique

If you follow the sciences, you know that Newt's moon station idea is not remotely absurd and should not be mocked. We could achieve the dream in well under eight years if done through a partnership with private enterprise as Newt has outlined.

Consider this: In 1969 we put a men on the moon in a small box with little reserve oxygen using the computing power of ONE 286 operating not on Windows 7, but a primitive, paper-card version of DOS, all of which was brand-new technology within the previous two years. And we did it, and controlling space - especially with the threat of Reagan's Star Wars defense system - led directly to the collapse of the Soviet Union.

Not only does NASA agree with Newt, they have already built a working prototype of the first stage of a modular station for deployment on the moon. This isn't science fiction. We easily have - and have long had - the science and computing power to quickly follow through. If the private sector foots the bill in partnership with NASA through tax and other incentives, we can do this right now - today. http://thefutureofthings.com/pod/179/nasa-reveals-prototype-moon-base.html


Newt is also not alone in this. From the respected science website, ZME Science: "In what can be considered a highly ambitious project, but quite highly unlikely to get passed bill, Rep. Bill Posey, R-Fla., has introduced H.R. 1641, the “Reasserting American Leadership in Space Act” or the “REAL Space Act” or simply the “Back to the Moon Bill,” as its named in the vernacular."
Read more: http://www.zmescience.com/space/bill-directing-nasa-build-moon-base-24143455/#ixzz1lAOQqyra


We have a space station right now orbiting the earth. It's been successfully operating and doing amazing research that has led to amazing new breakthroughs in medical research doing experiments which can only be done in Zero-G,- and it's been doing it for years.

A station on the moon in eight years would be a cinch as long as people remember that it will look more like today's space station - a likely utilitarian and not-at-all-glamorous collection of tubes and boxes - and not some glass-domed fantasy from an old science fiction movie.

The advantages of having such an operation on the moon are limitless, including owning space as a military power. From that perspective, God has given us a real gift when it comes to the moon: its synchronous orbit means that one side always faces the earth, so while the moon waxes and wanes in our sky, if the base is set up on what is called the near side of the moon, it can police the earth endlessly, 24/7. http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/Near_side_of_the_Moon
That's a gift from God.

Wake up. This is the kind of science and amazing technological application that ultimately brought the Soviet Union to a close. That's the kind of thing we want. Newt's right. Absolutely. It can be done. And it should. And it's up to us to shout down the mockery and call the mockery it what it is: dishonest and ignorant.

*****

I would suggest something along the following lines be said by the Speaker Gingrich, preferably alongside someone connected, past or present, to NASA:

"Look, we have a station in space which has been invaluable for us in everything from medical research to military strategy. It's been working for years and years. NASA says a modular base on the moon is entirely do-able right now, and even has a working prototype of the first stage of such an operation. In Reagan's era, so-called Star Wars, the strategic missile defense initiative, brought the Soviet Union to the table and ultimately led to their collapse. If we want to ensure peace on earth in the same way, America needs to be the undisputed Superpower of space. This entirely practical plan ensures that if funded in partnership with private industry. In fact, we could have already done this for the money Obama wasted on his stimulus package. We could have that station and it would already be creating thousands of more jobs than Obama's failed initiatives. if Governor Romney and congressman Santorum cannot understand these basic facts , then they need to talk to the man standing next to me with more doctorates than they have attack ads - He's (fill in the name and title) and he says it can be done. I refuse to be shackled by the dishonesty and ignorance of simple-minded politicians with no vision beyond their own political ambitions"

Newt can turn this around immediately. He can, he should - and he'll be back on top in a millisecond, because it's the mockery that's hurting him, and he can turn that around in one day.

*****

The photo at the top of this blog is an image of NASA's already-built, working prototype of the first stage of a moon station. We're ready to go. Let's partner with private industry and let the world know who is once again the science and military Superpower of space. Do it now. It's a much better investment than another of Obama's failed stimulus packages.